Eastern Africa vs Japan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Eastern Africa
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 141,119 t against -477,105 t in Eastern Africa, a difference of 618,224 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Eastern Africa ranks 34th and Japan ranks 26th of 38 regions.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -89,662 t | 349,269 t | 438,931 t | Japan |
| 1970s | -136,967 t | 444,881 t | 581,848 t | Japan |
| 1980s | -140,660 t | 431,896 t | 572,555 t | Japan |
| 1990s | -165,957 t | 356,112 t | 522,069 t | Japan |
| 2000s | -283,570 t | 268,365 t | 551,934 t | Japan |
| 2010s | -401,950 t | 218,848 t | 620,798 t | Japan |
| 2020s | -473,816 t | 163,623 t | 637,439 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Eastern Africa or Japan?
- Japan, at 141,119 t against -477,105 t in Eastern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Eastern Africa and Japan?
- 618,224 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Japan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Eastern Africa ranks 34th and Japan ranks 26th of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).