Eastern Europe vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium over time
- Eastern Europe
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 873,413 t against 369,950 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 503,463 t.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 2.4 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 7th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 38 regions.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.69 million t | 394,522 t | 5.30 million t | Eastern Europe |
| 1970s | 9.12 million t | 463,270 t | 8.66 million t | Eastern Europe |
| 1980s | 10.98 million t | 517,991 t | 10.47 million t | Eastern Europe |
| 1990s | 8.76 million t | 408,296 t | 8.35 million t | Eastern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland potassium, Eastern Europe or Yugoslav SFR?
- Eastern Europe, at 873,413 t against 369,950 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland potassium between Eastern Europe and Yugoslav SFR?
- 503,463 t, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Eastern Europe and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland potassium?
- Eastern Europe ranks 7th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).