Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 49,540 t against 42,392 t in Ecuador, a difference of 7,148 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 47th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 44th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,006 t | 32,595 t | 17,589 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 32,437 t | 21,861 t | 10,575 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 52,706 t | 37,466 t | 15,240 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 51,925 t | 48,812 t | 3,114 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 49,540 t against 42,392 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7,148 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Ecuador ranks 47th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 44th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).