Ecuador vs Sweden: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Ecuador
- Sweden
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 42,392 t against 40,885 t in Sweden, a difference of 1,507 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Ecuador ranks 49th and Sweden ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -17,435 t | 153,983 t | 171,418 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 8,418 t | 139,504 t | 131,087 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 18,260 t | 108,855 t | 90,595 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 15,240 t | 75,988 t | 60,748 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 32,437 t | 57,649 t | 25,212 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 52,706 t | 44,933 t | 7,773 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 51,925 t | 38,832 t | 13,093 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Ecuador or Sweden?
- Ecuador, at 42,392 t against 40,885 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Ecuador and Sweden?
- 1,507 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Ecuador ranks 49th and Sweden ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).