El Salvador vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- El Salvador
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 14,689 t against 9,020 t in El Salvador, a difference of 5,669 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.6 times El Salvador's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 68th and Serbia ranks 65th of 186 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,189 t | 62,220 t | 60,031 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 8,596 t | 44,979 t | 36,383 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 9,926 t | 32,258 t | 22,332 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, El Salvador or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 14,689 t against 9,020 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between El Salvador and Serbia?
- 5,669 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- El Salvador ranks 68th and Serbia ranks 65th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).