Eritrea vs Montenegro: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 5,900 t against 4,566 t in Eritrea, a difference of 1,334 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 80th and Montenegro ranks 77th of 201 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,783 t | 8,530 t | 4,747 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 4,323 t | 7,190 t | 2,867 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 4,564 t | 6,061 t | 1,497 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 5,900 t against 4,566 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Montenegro?
- 1,334 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Montenegro rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 80th and Montenegro ranks 77th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).