Eritrea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 4,566 t against 4,183 t in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 383 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 76th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 79th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 939.03 t | 1,432 t | 493.44 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 3,452 t | 1,927 t | 1,525 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 4,323 t | 3,813 t | 509.73 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 4,564 t | 3,992 t | 572.12 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland potassium, Eritrea or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Eritrea, at 4,566 t against 4,183 t in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland potassium between Eritrea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 383 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 76th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 79th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).