Estonia vs Panama: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Estonia
- Panama
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 15,816 t against 14,756 t in Panama, a difference of 1,060 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 66th and Panama ranks 67th of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35,372 t | 1,729 t | 33,643 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 19,937 t | 4,281 t | 15,656 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 20,046 t | 12,587 t | 7,459 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 17,559 t | 13,127 t | 4,432 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Estonia or Panama?
- Estonia, at 15,816 t against 14,756 t in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Estonia and Panama?
- 1,060 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Panama?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Panama rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Estonia ranks 66th and Panama ranks 67th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).