Ethiopia PDR vs Hungary: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Hungary
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 3,169 t against 3,006 t in Hungary, a difference of 163 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 87th and Hungary ranks 88th of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,840 t | 160,364 t | 154,524 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 2,816 t | 428,691 t | 425,875 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | -4,664 t | 429,977 t | 434,641 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | -2,915 t | 99,062 t | 101,976 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Ethiopia PDR or Hungary?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 3,169 t against 3,006 t in Hungary as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Ethiopia PDR and Hungary?
- 163 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Hungary?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Hungary rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 87th and Hungary ranks 88th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).