Fiji vs Saint Lucia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Fiji
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 133.57 t against 107.71 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 25.86 t.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.2 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Fiji ranks 111th and Saint Lucia ranks 112th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -3,883 t | -538.47 t | 3,345 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | -2,839 t | 398.23 t | 3,237 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | -1,544 t | -684.83 t | 858.68 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 612.43 t | -743.61 t | 1,356 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | -2,140 t | -166.88 t | 1,973 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | -62.06 t | 20.91 t | 82.97 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | -429.39 t | 73.71 t | 503.1 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Fiji or Saint Lucia?
- Fiji, at 133.57 t against 107.71 t in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Fiji and Saint Lucia?
- 25.86 t, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Saint Lucia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Fiji ranks 111th and Saint Lucia ranks 112th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).