Fiji vs Suriname: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Fiji
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 167.28 t against 133.57 t in Fiji, a difference of 33.71 t.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.3 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.
Fiji ranks 111th and Suriname ranks 108th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -3,883 t | -134.76 t | 3,748 t | Suriname |
| 1970s | -2,839 t | -284.7 t | 2,554 t | Suriname |
| 1980s | -1,544 t | 85.25 t | 1,629 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 612.43 t | -64.28 t | 676.7 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | -2,140 t | 365.97 t | 2,506 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | -62.06 t | -27.98 t | 34.08 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | -429.39 t | 208.27 t | 637.67 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Fiji or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 167.28 t against 133.57 t in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Fiji and Suriname?
- 33.71 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Suriname rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Fiji ranks 111th and Suriname ranks 108th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).