Gambia vs Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Gambia
- Sudan
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 133.79 t against 86.21 t in Sudan, a difference of 47.58 t.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.6 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Gambia ranks 110th and Sudan ranks 113th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -426.7 t | 783.24 t | 1,210 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | -121.47 t | -14,053 t | 13,931 t | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Gambia or Sudan?
- Gambia, at 133.79 t against 86.21 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Gambia and Sudan?
- 47.58 t, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Gambia and Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Gambia ranks 110th and Sudan ranks 113th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).