Georgia vs Puerto Rico: Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium over time
- Georgia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 2,632 t against 2,495 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 137 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Georgia ranks 90th and Puerto Rico ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 244.7 t | 5,715 t | 5,471 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 1,488 t | 4,242 t | 2,754 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 2,063 t | 3,705 t | 1,642 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 2,401 t | 2,998 t | 597.35 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland potassium, Georgia or Puerto Rico?
- Georgia, at 2,632 t against 2,495 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland potassium between Georgia and Puerto Rico?
- 137 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Puerto Rico?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Puerto Rico rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland potassium?
- Georgia ranks 90th and Puerto Rico ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).