Grenada vs Maldives: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Grenada
- Maldives
How they compare
Grenada currently reports -28.45 t against -137.66 t in Maldives, a difference of 109.21 t.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.
Grenada ranks 121st and Maldives ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 5 and Maldives in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -220.26 t | -115.06 t | 105.2 t | Maldives |
| 1970s | -152.25 t | -133.08 t | 19.17 t | Maldives |
| 1980s | -160.51 t | -178.36 t | 17.85 t | Grenada |
| 1990s | -95.56 t | -161.09 t | 65.53 t | Grenada |
| 2000s | -39.17 t | -242.68 t | 203.51 t | Grenada |
| 2010s | -61.89 t | -213.47 t | 151.58 t | Grenada |
| 2020s | -36.27 t | -186.09 t | 149.82 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Grenada or Maldives?
- Grenada, at -28.45 t against -137.66 t in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Grenada and Maldives?
- 109.21 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Maldives?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Maldives rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Grenada ranks 121st and Maldives ranks 124th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).