Guatemala vs Zambia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Guatemala
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports -8,398 t against -8,969 t in Guatemala, a difference of 571 t.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 152nd and Zambia ranks 151st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,477 t | -591.37 t | 3,068 t | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 4,815 t | 1,116 t | 3,699 t | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 4,011 t | 1,607 t | 2,405 t | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 6,195 t | 1,524 t | 4,671 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 509.1 t | 2,348 t | 1,839 t | Zambia |
| 2010s | 3,211 t | -4,062 t | 7,273 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 4,013 t | 5,446 t | 1,433 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Guatemala or Zambia?
- Zambia, at -8,398 t against -8,969 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Guatemala and Zambia?
- 571 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Zambia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Guatemala ranks 152nd and Zambia ranks 151st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).