Honduras vs Saudi Arabia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Honduras
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 41,738 t against 36,531 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 5,207 t.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 51st and Saudi Arabia ranks 54th of 201 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,221 t | -2,127 t | 11,349 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 11,187 t | -1,544 t | 12,731 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 8,999 t | 6,687 t | 2,312 t | Honduras |
| 1990s | 11,256 t | -8,440 t | 19,696 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 11,084 t | -2,214 t | 13,298 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 30,453 t | 11,910 t | 18,543 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 43,510 t | 41,697 t | 1,812 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Honduras or Saudi Arabia?
- Honduras, at 41,738 t against 36,531 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Honduras and Saudi Arabia?
- 5,207 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Honduras ranks 51st and Saudi Arabia ranks 54th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).