Hungary vs Puerto Rico: Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium over time
- Hungary
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 3,006 t against 2,495 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 511 t.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 88th and Puerto Rico ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 160,364 t | -2,461 t | 162,825 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 428,691 t | 5,934 t | 422,756 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 429,977 t | 6,144 t | 423,833 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 62,003 t | 5,641 t | 56,362 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 40,900 t | 4,242 t | 36,657 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 36,641 t | 3,705 t | 32,936 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 42,875 t | 2,998 t | 39,877 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland potassium, Hungary or Puerto Rico?
- Hungary, at 3,006 t against 2,495 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland potassium between Hungary and Puerto Rico?
- 511 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Puerto Rico rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland potassium?
- Hungary ranks 88th and Puerto Rico ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).