India vs Nigeria: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- India
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports -777,953 t against -1.95 million t in India, a difference of 1.17 million t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.
India ranks 201st and Nigeria ranks 200th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 5 and Nigeria in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 343,781 t | -141,144 t | 484,924 t | India |
| 1970s | 378,645 t | -143,091 t | 521,736 t | India |
| 1980s | 601,053 t | -119,945 t | 720,998 t | India |
| 1990s | 276,312 t | -324,452 t | 600,764 t | India |
| 2000s | 527,876 t | -505,016 t | 1.03 million t | India |
| 2010s | -653,884 t | -596,326 t | 57,558 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | -1.42 million t | -733,274 t | 687,249 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, India or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at -777,953 t against -1.95 million t in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between India and Nigeria?
- 1.17 million t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Nigeria?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do India and Nigeria rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- India ranks 201st and Nigeria ranks 200th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).