Ireland vs Western Asia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Ireland
- Western Asia
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 132,533 t against -498,184 t in Western Asia, a difference of 630,717 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 28th and Western Asia ranks 35th of 185 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Western Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 104,582 t | -150,631 t | 255,213 t | Ireland |
| 1970s | 141,926 t | -216,740 t | 358,667 t | Ireland |
| 1980s | 144,636 t | -294,418 t | 439,054 t | Ireland |
| 1990s | 145,864 t | -412,274 t | 558,138 t | Ireland |
| 2000s | 135,341 t | -446,765 t | 582,105 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 136,474 t | -436,087 t | 572,561 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 139,629 t | -451,351 t | 590,980 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Ireland or Western Asia?
- Ireland, at 132,533 t against -498,184 t in Western Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Ireland and Western Asia?
- 630,717 t, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Western Asia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Western Asia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Ireland ranks 28th and Western Asia ranks 35th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).