Israel vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Israel
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 21,250 t against 18,023 t in Israel, a difference of 3,227 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Israel ranks 64th and Slovenia ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16,435 t | 35,354 t | 18,919 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 15,945 t | 28,475 t | 12,530 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 14,335 t | 22,309 t | 7,975 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 18,136 t | 20,566 t | 2,430 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Israel or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 21,250 t against 18,023 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Israel and Slovenia?
- 3,227 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Slovenia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Israel ranks 64th and Slovenia ranks 61st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).