Japan vs Mongolia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Japan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 213,896 t against 141,119 t in Japan, a difference of 72,777 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.5 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 27th and Mongolia ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 6 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 349,269 t | 82,331 t | 266,938 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 444,881 t | 92,186 t | 352,695 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 431,896 t | 97,492 t | 334,404 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 356,112 t | 118,950 t | 237,161 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 268,365 t | 107,801 t | 160,563 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 218,848 t | 154,174 t | 64,674 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 163,623 t | 214,412 t | 50,789 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Japan or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 213,896 t against 141,119 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Japan and Mongolia?
- 72,777 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Mongolia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Japan ranks 27th and Mongolia ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).