Kazakhstan vs Portugal: Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium over time
- Kazakhstan
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 81,476 t against 65,582 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 15,894 t.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 40th and Portugal ranks 37th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 180,042 t | 104,699 t | 75,343 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 87,122 t | 90,987 t | 3,865 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 81,241 t | 85,960 t | 4,719 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 48,718 t | 82,948 t | 34,230 t | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland potassium, Kazakhstan or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 81,476 t against 65,582 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland potassium between Kazakhstan and Portugal?
- 15,894 t, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Portugal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Portugal rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland potassium?
- Kazakhstan ranks 40th and Portugal ranks 37th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).