Kazakhstan vs Sudan (former): Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 68,159 t against 65,582 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2,577 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 40th and Sudan (former) ranks 39th of 201 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 180,042 t | 22,991 t | 157,051 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 87,122 t | 62,890 t | 24,232 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 101,244 t | 77,880 t | 23,364 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland potassium, Kazakhstan or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 68,159 t against 65,582 t in Kazakhstan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland potassium between Kazakhstan and Sudan (former)?
- 2,577 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan (former)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan (former) rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland potassium?
- Kazakhstan ranks 40th and Sudan (former) ranks 39th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).