Kazakhstan vs Switzerland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Kazakhstan
- Switzerland
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 65,582 t against 57,230 t in Switzerland, a difference of 8,352 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 40th and Switzerland ranks 43rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 180,042 t | 86,199 t | 93,844 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 87,122 t | 69,244 t | 17,877 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 81,241 t | 63,128 t | 18,113 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 48,718 t | 59,963 t | 11,245 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Kazakhstan or Switzerland?
- Kazakhstan, at 65,582 t against 57,230 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Kazakhstan and Switzerland?
- 8,352 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Switzerland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Switzerland rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Kazakhstan ranks 40th and Switzerland ranks 43rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).