Kyrgyzstan vs Nicaragua: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 53,531 t against 49,540 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3,991 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 44th and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,595 t | 13,027 t | 19,568 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 21,861 t | 39,112 t | 17,250 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 37,466 t | 47,219 t | 9,753 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 48,812 t | 54,590 t | 5,778 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Kyrgyzstan or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 53,531 t against 49,540 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 3,991 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 44th and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).