Kyrgyzstan vs Switzerland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 57,230 t against 49,540 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 7,690 t.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 44th and Switzerland ranks 41st of 186 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,595 t | 86,199 t | 53,604 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 21,861 t | 69,244 t | 47,383 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 37,466 t | 63,128 t | 25,662 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 48,812 t | 59,963 t | 11,152 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Kyrgyzstan or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 57,230 t against 49,540 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Kyrgyzstan and Switzerland?
- 7,690 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Switzerland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Switzerland rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 44th and Switzerland ranks 41st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).