Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
401,839 t
in 2023
Russian Federation
294,189 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
16th
Russian Federation rank
19th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Russian Federation
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 401,839 t against 294,189 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 107,650 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.4 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 436,446 t 1.91 million t 1.48 million t Russian Federation
2000s 270,903 t 814,123 t 543,220 t Russian Federation
2010s 350,140 t 477,961 t 127,821 t Russian Federation
2020s 392,338 t 357,570 t 34,768 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Russian Federation?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 401,839 t against 294,189 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation?
107,650 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation-2/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).