Lesotho vs Malta: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Lesotho
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 1,024 t against 822.71 t in Lesotho, a difference of 201.29 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 99th and Malta ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 6 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 829.84 t | 536.85 t | 292.99 t | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 1,169 t | 918.83 t | 249.86 t | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 1,330 t | 1,318 t | 12.02 t | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 2,108 t | 1,545 t | 562.41 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 2,306 t | 1,451 t | 855.69 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 1,333 t | 1,029 t | 303.99 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 875.53 t | 1,050 t | 174.52 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Lesotho or Malta?
- Malta, at 1,024 t against 822.71 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Lesotho and Malta?
- 201.29 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Malta rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Lesotho ranks 99th and Malta ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).