Libya vs Solomon Islands: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Libya
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Libya currently reports -2,809 t against -3,464 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 655 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 141st and Solomon Islands ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 5 and Solomon Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -114.74 t | -1,136 t | 1,022 t | Libya |
| 1970s | -159.88 t | -1,327 t | 1,167 t | Libya |
| 1980s | -1,609 t | -2,090 t | 481.46 t | Libya |
| 1990s | -1,135 t | -2,513 t | 1,377 t | Libya |
| 2000s | -1,536 t | -3,282 t | 1,746 t | Libya |
| 2010s | -3,612 t | -2,362 t | 1,250 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | -3,325 t | -3,002 t | 322.65 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Libya or Solomon Islands?
- Libya, at -2,809 t against -3,464 t in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Libya and Solomon Islands?
- 655 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Solomon Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Solomon Islands rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Libya ranks 141st and Solomon Islands ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).