Lithuania vs Saudi Arabia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Lithuania
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 36,531 t against 25,483 t in Lithuania, a difference of 11,048 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.4 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 55th and Saudi Arabia ranks 52nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 73,974 t | -9,607 t | 83,580 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 52,633 t | -2,214 t | 54,847 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 43,026 t | 11,910 t | 31,116 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 29,693 t | 41,697 t | 12,005 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Lithuania or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 36,531 t against 25,483 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Lithuania and Saudi Arabia?
- 11,048 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Lithuania ranks 55th and Saudi Arabia ranks 52nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).