Luxembourg vs Namibia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Luxembourg
- Namibia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 5,380 t against 4,299 t in Namibia, a difference of 1,081 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 78th and Namibia ranks 81st of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,511 t | 3,022 t | 2,488 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 5,454 t | 3,502 t | 1,952 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 5,380 t | 3,292 t | 2,087 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Luxembourg or Namibia?
- Luxembourg, at 5,380 t against 4,299 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Luxembourg and Namibia?
- 1,081 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Namibia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Luxembourg ranks 78th and Namibia ranks 81st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).