Malawi vs Mozambique: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Malawi
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports -55,512 t against -58,707 t in Malawi, a difference of 3,195 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 182nd and Mozambique ranks 181st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -6,018 t | -22,488 t | 16,469 t | Malawi |
| 1970s | -9,292 t | -26,781 t | 17,488 t | Malawi |
| 1980s | -10,912 t | -18,569 t | 7,657 t | Malawi |
| 1990s | -19,574 t | -18,093 t | 1,481 t | Mozambique |
| 2000s | -37,090 t | -32,432 t | 4,658 t | Mozambique |
| 2010s | -60,320 t | -47,081 t | 13,239 t | Mozambique |
| 2020s | -60,211 t | -53,832 t | 6,379 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Malawi or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at -55,512 t against -58,707 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Malawi and Mozambique?
- 3,195 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mozambique?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Mozambique rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Malawi ranks 182nd and Mozambique ranks 181st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).