Malta vs New Caledonia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Malta
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 1,024 t against 953.54 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 70.46 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Malta ranks 97th and New Caledonia ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 6 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 536.85 t | 538.19 t | 1.34 t | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 918.83 t | 645.84 t | 272.99 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 1,318 t | 827.05 t | 491.07 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 1,545 t | 875.06 t | 670.27 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 1,451 t | 969.62 t | 481.11 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 1,029 t | 924.63 t | 104.73 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 1,050 t | 941.76 t | 108.29 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Malta or New Caledonia?
- Malta, at 1,024 t against 953.54 t in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Malta and New Caledonia?
- 70.46 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Caledonia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and New Caledonia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Malta ranks 97th and New Caledonia ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).