Middle Africa vs Mongolia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Middle Africa
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 213,896 t against -341,623 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 555,519 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 26th and Mongolia ranks 25th of 32 groups.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -102,934 t | 82,331 t | 185,265 t | Mongolia |
| 1970s | -109,979 t | 92,186 t | 202,165 t | Mongolia |
| 1980s | -119,383 t | 97,492 t | 216,875 t | Mongolia |
| 1990s | -145,014 t | 118,950 t | 263,964 t | Mongolia |
| 2000s | -159,238 t | 107,801 t | 267,039 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | -307,043 t | 154,174 t | 461,218 t | Mongolia |
| 2020s | -342,700 t | 214,412 t | 557,112 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Middle Africa or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 213,896 t against -341,623 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Middle Africa and Mongolia?
- 555,519 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Mongolia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Middle Africa ranks 26th and Mongolia ranks 25th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).