Mozambique vs Uganda: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Mozambique
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports -50,150 t against -55,512 t in Mozambique, a difference of 5,362 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 181st and Uganda ranks 178th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -22,488 t | -42,787 t | 20,299 t | Mozambique |
| 1970s | -26,781 t | -70,465 t | 43,684 t | Mozambique |
| 1980s | -18,569 t | -57,171 t | 38,601 t | Mozambique |
| 1990s | -18,093 t | -65,372 t | 47,279 t | Mozambique |
| 2000s | -32,432 t | -71,887 t | 39,456 t | Mozambique |
| 2010s | -47,081 t | -36,778 t | 10,302 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | -53,832 t | -54,122 t | 290.47 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Mozambique or Uganda?
- Uganda, at -50,150 t against -55,512 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Mozambique and Uganda?
- 5,362 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Uganda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Mozambique ranks 181st and Uganda ranks 178th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).