Myanmar vs Republic of Moldova: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Myanmar
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 222,895 t against -6,721 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 229,616 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 33.2 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 21st and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 186 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 182,987 t | 26,550 t | 156,437 t | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 161,003 t | 4,049 t | 156,954 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 271,873 t | -2,198 t | 274,071 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 188,680 t | -3,153 t | 191,832 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Myanmar or Republic of Moldova?
- Myanmar, at 222,895 t against -6,721 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Myanmar and Republic of Moldova?
- 229,616 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Republic of Moldova rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Myanmar ranks 21st and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).