Myanmar vs Russian Federation: Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium over time
- Myanmar
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 294,189 t against 222,895 t in Myanmar, a difference of 71,294 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.3 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Myanmar ranks 22nd and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 201 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 182,987 t | 1.91 million t | 1.73 million t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 161,003 t | 814,123 t | 653,120 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 271,873 t | 477,961 t | 206,088 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 188,680 t | 357,570 t | 168,891 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland potassium, Myanmar or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 294,189 t against 222,895 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland potassium between Myanmar and Russian Federation?
- 71,294 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Russian Federation rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland potassium?
- Myanmar ranks 22nd and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).