Nauru vs Tonga: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium

Nauru
2.33 t
in 2023
Tonga
-51.23 t
in 2023
Nauru rank
119th
Tonga rank
122nd

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time

  • Nauru
  • Tonga
-1.0k-5000500196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 2.33 t against -51.23 t in Tonga, a difference of 53.56 t.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 119th and Tonga ranks 122nd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 6 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Tonga Difference Ahead
1960s -2.24 t -818.52 t 816.29 t Nauru
1970s -0.9847 t -602.76 t 601.78 t Nauru
1980s 1.51 t -23.21 t 24.72 t Nauru
1990s 4.1 t 56.89 t 52.79 t Tonga
2000s 2.31 t -168.68 t 170.99 t Nauru
2010s 2.26 t -180.51 t 182.77 t Nauru
2020s 2.38 t -11.77 t 14.16 t Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Nauru or Tonga?
Nauru, at 2.33 t against -51.23 t in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Nauru and Tonga?
53.56 t, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tonga?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Tonga rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
Nauru ranks 119th and Tonga ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).