New Zealand vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- New Zealand
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 14,689 t against 11,233 t in New Zealand, a difference of 3,456 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times New Zealand's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 65th of 186 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,700 t | 62,220 t | 49,520 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 14,169 t | 44,979 t | 30,810 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 13,614 t | 32,258 t | 18,644 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, New Zealand or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 14,689 t against 11,233 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between New Zealand and Serbia?
- 3,456 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- New Zealand ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 65th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).