Nicaragua vs South Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Nicaragua
- South Sudan
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 53,531 t against 52,810 t in South Sudan, a difference of 721 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 42nd and South Sudan ranks 43rd of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 48,207 t | 48,344 t | 136.31 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 54,590 t | 52,247 t | 2,343 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Nicaragua or South Sudan?
- Nicaragua, at 53,531 t against 52,810 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 721 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and South Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Nicaragua ranks 42nd and South Sudan ranks 43rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).