Nigeria vs Ukraine: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium

Nigeria
-777,953 t
in 2023
Ukraine
-289,868 t
in 2023
Nigeria rank
200th
Ukraine rank
197th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time

  • Nigeria
  • Ukraine
-1.0M-500.0k0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports -289,868 t against -777,953 t in Nigeria, a difference of 488,085 t.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.

Nigeria ranks 200th and Ukraine ranks 197th of 201 countries.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s -355,685 t 809,019 t 1.16 million t Ukraine
2000s -505,016 t 172,576 t 677,592 t Ukraine
2010s -596,326 t -91,050 t 505,276 t Ukraine
2020s -733,274 t -194,957 t 538,316 t Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Nigeria or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at -289,868 t against -777,953 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Nigeria and Ukraine?
488,085 t, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Ukraine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Nigeria and Ukraine rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
Nigeria ranks 200th and Ukraine ranks 197th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).