Northern America vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Northern America
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Northern America currently reports 859,452 t against 367,627 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 491,825 t.
That makes Northern America's figure about 2.3 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.
Northern America ranks 11th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 29 groups.
Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern America | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.22 million t | 81,948 t | 2.13 million t | Northern America |
| 2000s | 1.46 million t | 79,649 t | 1.38 million t | Northern America |
| 2010s | 798,477 t | 224,005 t | 574,472 t | Northern America |
| 2020s | 831,878 t | 328,790 t | 503,088 t | Northern America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Northern America or Uzbekistan?
- Northern America, at 859,452 t against 367,627 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Northern America and Uzbekistan?
- 491,825 t, with Northern America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Northern America and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Northern America ranks 11th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).