Panama vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Panama
- Serbia
How they compare
Panama currently reports 14,756 t against 14,689 t in Serbia, a difference of 67 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Panama ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 68th of 201 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,680 t | 62,220 t | 58,540 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 12,587 t | 44,979 t | 32,392 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 13,127 t | 32,258 t | 19,131 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Panama or Serbia?
- Panama, at 14,756 t against 14,689 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Panama and Serbia?
- 67 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Panama ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 68th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).