Poland vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Poland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 367,627 t against 327,408 t in Poland, a difference of 40,219 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 201 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 395,589 t | 81,948 t | 313,641 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 426,989 t | 79,649 t | 347,341 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 457,491 t | 224,005 t | 233,486 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 398,041 t | 328,790 t | 69,250 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Poland or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 367,627 t against 327,408 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 40,219 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Poland ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).