Poland vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Poland
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 369,950 t against 327,408 t in Poland, a difference of 42,542 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 14th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 201 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 650,974 t | 394,522 t | 256,452 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 1.30 million t | 463,270 t | 841,017 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 1.13 million t | 517,991 t | 614,078 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 505,378 t | 408,296 t | 97,082 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Poland or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 369,950 t against 327,408 t in Poland as of 1991.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Poland and Yugoslav SFR?
- 42,542 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Poland and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Poland ranks 14th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).