Republic of Moldova vs Thailand: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 294,807 t against -6,721 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 301,528 t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 43.9 times Republic of Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Thailand ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 17th of 18 groups.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,550 t | 144,257 t | 117,707 t | Thailand |
| 2000s | 4,049 t | 51,726 t | 47,676 t | Thailand |
| 2010s | -2,198 t | 111,062 t | 113,260 t | Thailand |
| 2020s | -3,153 t | 227,063 t | 230,216 t | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Republic of Moldova or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 294,807 t against -6,721 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Republic of Moldova and Thailand?
- 301,528 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Thailand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Thailand rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 17th of 18 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).