Russian Federation vs Türkiye: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Russian Federation
- Türkiye
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 294,189 t against -474,457 t in Türkiye, a difference of 768,646 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 18th and Türkiye ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.91 million t | -323,820 t | 2.24 million t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 814,123 t | -349,893 t | 1.16 million t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 477,961 t | -379,680 t | 857,641 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 357,570 t | -431,868 t | 789,439 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Russian Federation or Türkiye?
- Russian Federation, at 294,189 t against -474,457 t in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Russian Federation and Türkiye?
- 768,646 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Türkiye?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Türkiye rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Russian Federation ranks 18th and Türkiye ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).