Slovakia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Slovakia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 4,183 t against 3,654 t in Slovakia, a difference of 529 t.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 81st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 79th of 186 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44,893 t | 1,432 t | 43,460 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 26,604 t | 1,927 t | 24,677 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 14,829 t | 3,813 t | 11,016 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 9,447 t | 3,992 t | 5,456 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Slovakia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 4,183 t against 3,654 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Slovakia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 529 t, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Slovakia ranks 81st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 79th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).