Saint Lucia vs Tuvalu: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Saint Lucia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 107.71 t against 73.09 t in Tuvalu, a difference of 34.62 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.5 times Tuvalu's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 112th and Tuvalu ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -538.47 t | 13.36 t | 551.82 t | Tuvalu |
| 1970s | 398.23 t | 20.14 t | 378.08 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | -684.83 t | 33.51 t | 718.34 t | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | -743.61 t | 66.87 t | 810.48 t | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | -166.88 t | 72.31 t | 239.19 t | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 20.91 t | 75.51 t | 54.6 t | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 73.71 t | 72.36 t | 1.35 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Saint Lucia or Tuvalu?
- Saint Lucia, at 107.71 t against 73.09 t in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Saint Lucia and Tuvalu?
- 34.62 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Saint Lucia and Tuvalu rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Saint Lucia ranks 112th and Tuvalu ranks 114th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).