Sudan vs Tuvalu: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Sudan
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 86.21 t against 73.09 t in Tuvalu, a difference of 13.12 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Tuvalu's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 113th and Tuvalu ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 783.24 t | 75.4 t | 707.84 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | -14,053 t | 72.36 t | 14,125 t | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Sudan or Tuvalu?
- Sudan, at 86.21 t against 73.09 t in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Sudan and Tuvalu?
- 13.12 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tuvalu?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Tuvalu rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Sudan ranks 113th and Tuvalu ranks 114th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).